Vadodra riot looks another clash between Hindu and Muslim which is being showed by the media what up till now has been picturised.
Just have a look at the whole story, how it goes:
1] High Court order to the Municipal Co-operation to demolish all the religious structure being develop or is developed before on the Government places which include mandir, masjid, dargah in Vadodra.
2] Municipal Co-operation follows the order and go ahead with the demolition. In spite of going with the mandir they first chose to demolish the dargah, which is really a smart move.
3] At the time of demolition the dargah Muslims protested and its quiet a obvious reaction which the administration was expecting.
4] To defend themselves they were along with the Police protection to control the angriness of the people. Police used various ways of attacking them.
(Firing, tear gas, etc.)
5] Crowd reacted in the same way and went ahead with the reaction. Point here is the damage they do to the public property is not their own, it belongs to someone else.
6] Supreme Court orders to put a stay on the demolition process.
Conclusion: - All the religious structures are safe enough and no one can do
anything wrong with them.
Loss: - Poor people whose shops are burnt, who had lost their lives and other
damages made by the enraged public have to reclaim through insurance,
if they had made any.
Can somebody explain us why such a bad politics is being played by our so called politicians?