An entry-level DSLR is always going to be a tricky product to positon within a manufacturer’s range, as there’s only so much tech you can incorporate before it’ll encroach on mid-range models. However, with the competing Nikon D3300 already offering a higher resolution and more sensitive sensor than the 1200D, along with a faster continuous shooting rate and a slightly more sophisticated AF system, So Canon had also upgraded thier DSLR to 1300D with some higher specification.
The EOS 1300D is fundamentally unchanged from its predecessor, hence the sensor, shooting speed, AF and video frame rate all continue to trail the D3300. The 1300D’s upgraded screen hardly matches the Nikon’s monitor resolution, so in terms of headline features, the Canon has to rely solely on its new Wi-Fi connectivity to win on a specs comparison. Assuming that the D3300’s replacement will almost certainly feature built-in Wi-Fi, the 1300D looks even more vulnerable.
Now coming to the picture quality EOS 1300D is a good DLSR for entry level photographer. Its coming with a 18 Mega Pixel with TTL-CT-SIR with a CMOS sensor with an ISO range of 100-6400. This DSLR comes with a 9 AF points which a good for a entry level CAMERA. I don’t say much about battery life and EOS 1300D have some problem with the Battery life. Maximum are facing problem with the battery life.
So, if you are new to photography and want a DSLR in your budget, then I think Canon will be good.
Thanks and regards
Sami Ehtesam Raza