Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

Cosmopolitan

0 Followers
2.8

Summary

Cosmopolitan
Sunil Kumar@sunil15
Apr 01, 2002 08:36 PM, 4812 Views
(Updated Apr 01, 2002)
All Hype No Content

Well here is classic example how a good thing and nice money can be wasted into making a magazine which is totally biased and takes crude cuts.

I must admit that their observation of the ’’COSMOPOLITAN’’ woman is quite bad. All they ever think is that the C women do is come out and talk sex. Well, I don understand that we are way too conservative in talking about marital or pre marital sex. But, that doesn’t mean we should think, eat and leave sex. At the end of the day anything over done gets crape.

I would never rate this magazine as a women’s magazine. I would rather rate this as a magazine out for some cheap publicity and sales. I am a sure more guy read this then Women (not that other magazines or read more by women nor it is a compulsion). The whole point here is lets get constructive and think and write what the new actual C woman need in India or else where need.

All I say in conclusion is please think about the content and where you have positioned the Magazine. I guess this can be branded a soft porn woman magazine at the most.

(1)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post

Recommended Top Articles

Question & Answer