I wonder why? Every critic accepts that DSIM is very good on Marketing but complain about training. DSIM is not selling a product but is teaching Digital Marketing. Now if they can market it’s brand, then it is upto the student to learn it or crib.
I believe if someone is good at Marketing their brand and all they are teaching is to how one can learn to do the same: the problem logically should be with the one who is complaining. Yes, if they were making scooters and selling them as cars, maybe one could accept the logic. But the logic that they are good at Marketing but not good at teaching Marketing is a big?