Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×
4.6

Summary

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Movie
Nisha menon@nmenon1
Mar 08, 2008 08:07 PM, 2530 Views
(Updated Mar 08, 2008)
It's magic......

I love the Harry Potter books. I’ve read all the books straight through and loved every word of the series!I have no idea how many times I must have read these books.When i  heard that the harry potter movies were being made I was very much excited to see it However the movie did not  live up to my expectations; to me it


felt rushed and choppy.Good reading sometimes may not always make good viewing


just as the reverse holds good - making films out of popular books is a


hard task itself considering that imagination is a wide canvas


While all the splendid magic in the book comes alive


in the movie because of those jaw-dropping special effects, J. K.


Rowling’s wit and rich characterisation get left behind in her


surprising, lovely prose. The speed and choppiness of


the movie took away from the characters. It was just events and there


was hardly any character development at all


Chris Columbus’s direction is competent but workmanlike. It lacks imagination, something the Rowling books have plenty of. It is shrewdly respectful of the


book, clearly reluctant to alienate any part of the strong reading fan


base, a few omissions and sketchy details notwithstanding. But then the


masterfully made film offers no surprises, to those who have read the


book. As far as Harry knows, his parents were killed in a car crash


when he was an infant and he is left with muggles(non-wizards) - his


uncle and aunt. He is the poor relative relegated to the closet He has to wait on them, a la Cinderella,


and on their obnoxious pudgy son Dudley who gets all the attention and


the presents. But comes Harry’s 11th birthday and everything changes. A


gentle giant Hagrid(Robbie Coltrane) literally crashes into their


lives to inform Harry that he is a wizard by birth and that he has been


invited to study at the Hogwarts School Of Witchcraft and Wizardry for


gifted young witches and wizards - a boarding filled with semi-giants,


three headed dogs, owls, jelly beans of every imaginable flavour, and


of course sinister forces. At Hogwarts, Harry is tutored in the art of


potions, spells and riding a broomstick. He is watched by head master


Dumbledore(Richard Harris) a wise, silver bearded man and Snape(Alan Rickman) professor of


potions, the quavering Quirrell(Ian Hart) and pals, Ron(Rupert Grint)


and Hermione(Emma Watson).


Harry also finds at Hogwarts much of what his


pitiful life has lacked - close friends and the truth about his parents




  • magical skills unknown to him and recognition of his own worth! He




also gets to be on the Quidditch team(a kind of airborne soccer) an


honour that rarely comes to first years. But then he also gets many


things he didn’t bargain for. The shots of Hogwarts central hallway with its moving staircases


and animated portraits are marvelous. And the Quidditch scene where a


strange game is played on broomsticks is truly gripping - it is fantasy


at its height. And the choosing of the houses? When Harry is being


assigned to one of Hogwarts four houses the `sorting hat’ assesses his


character and then applauds him for `having courage, talent, not a bad


mind and a thirst to prove’ and puts him into the house of Gryffindor


much to Harry’s relief


There are many positive elements in the midst of some


questions about the very existence of witchery and wizardry.For


instance, the evil acts of darkside wizards such as the killing of a


unicorn for its life giving blood- are denounced.Lines spoken by the


bad guys expose the evil side and are swiftly refuted.The footage of Harry’s battle scene is shorter in


the film than in the book, but is far more exciting because of its


visual power.And what about the fact that Harry and his friends sometimes break


rules with impunity though played down in the film? But shorn of all


the questions and taken at the surface level the film is truly worth


seeing.The quality of work that has gone into finding the right faces


for the characters and their costumes is something outstanding. It’s


probably as close to what the author J. K. Rowling imagined while she


wrote the book. Daniel Radcliff who plays Harry is utterly charming.


frank and vulnerable, he tugs at your heartstrings especially in the


scene where he looks into the mirror of the future and sees himself


with his parents. Emma Watson as Hermoine is self-possessed, slightly


imperious and loyal played beautifully and Rupert Grint does full justice to his role


.

(2)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post
Question & Answer