Hi
In my previous review I forgot to comment on the comfort levels of Unicorn before commenting I want to make clear that it’s nonsense to compare two different Company designs, and at the same time each designs will have their own advantages and disadvantages
When it comes to the differences Between Unicorn & Pulsar designs
Cons about Unicorn Design
Overall Design is Okay the middle battery cover is too poor in its quality and looks wise it gives an opinion as if its got altered from other bike, it has good looks from front, The designers has given more importance to front light & tank, which are highlights of this design, the merging of tank to seat looks very gauche.
coming to the panel under the seat: the side view of this design is good but as it has to get merged to the tail lamp the designer has no other option left except to live with that bulky look from back. Overall Honda Unicorn design is not full up to the mark when it is compared to the CBZ’S looks
Cons about Pulsar Design
It looks good from front but the designer hasn’t shown much Importance to back & the New head light shape is good but slickness misses and the screw’s used on the front light could have fitted from inside, the major problem in this design is it looks very bulky in front and too short (as if something missed out at back), the designer hasn’t maintained balance in the front & back
Comfort Levels as Pulsar an Indian product you can find the difference, I don’t know why the handle is very hard to rotate and driver has to lean towards front to ride, and due to this extra weight gets mounted on front wheel and bending towards front is prone for Back pains & discomfort in City to Drive.
Comfort wise Unicorn has done a very good job. To find the deference of this just drive the both vehicles
Final word: Looks wise at first glance you will attract to Pulsar but Ultimately when you ride both you will get attracted to the Comfort & looks