Does India have a clear cut agenda when dealing with Pakistan? Routine ceasefire violations indicate the opposite

There is anger written all over the faces of the officers and jawans over the beheading and mutilation of two of their men here along the line of control.

An angry officer said the ceasefire agreement reached between the two countries in 2003 " was not worth the paper it was signed on" as the Pakistan Army routinely violates the agreement through firing and shelling .

Hours after Tuesday's incident in which Pakistani troops entered Indian territory and killed two Indian soldiers, intense firing continued till Wednesday morning.

Every time there is an India-Pakistan dispute, Pakistan's response appears smarter. Consider these points, and tell us if you think so too

1. Pakistan's response is always clearer, faster and more definitive.

   
   




2. Pakistan's response is led by higher ranking officials and ministers than India.

   
   




3. By offering international mediation, Pakistan gives the impression of being more neutral.

   
   




4. India's response is slow, but more representative.

   
   




5. Indian diplomacy works through politicians and not army, which slows and confuses our response.

   
   

Therefore, who is smarter "India"?? Or "Pakistan"??

"India as a nation have army but in Pakistan army have nation."

Note :: From Internet Sources jst wanted to share with you guys..