______

Few days back a member of MS(jazzy) wrote a review on PM Manmohan that seemed more sort of jingoist anti-manmohan or congress rather than rational. Although most of the things that he said in the review were true , but the interesting thing was the battle that occurred in comments section mainly between Bewafa , Harpreet , Mannsor and Jazzy.

Most of the things which mannsor said seemed right , but now as the events have unfolded in the past few days it seemed as if manmohan might be a shaky person.

I supported Mannsor when he said that Sikhs holding French Nationality aren’t subject to any support from India or PM , but I was just shocked to see the way Manmohan and his team came out of their way forward to support L.N. Mittal , now what is the connection of LN Mittal from India , he too holds UK nationality and his issue is also of little benefit to our nation now I have fully failed to understand Indian Government’s stance here. What message Mannu and His team is trying to give , will he support only affluent doesn’t matter what the issue will be?

One thing that was also said or rather commented by two members above that “PM will raise this issue in the right forum” , now I can’t see any right forum other than French President Chirac himself visiting India , he came and went , LN Mittal was all over but nothing was said about this issue.

Now anyone says that what will be the use if Manmohan says anything about this issue of Sikhs of France , now same question should also be raised for LN Mittal , what our SARDAR got by speaking on it , and if that violates WTO norms , then the banning of Turban also violates the norms of EU regarding practicing the religion

I am astonished to see the double standards of Government here.

Moreover I would also like to draw the attention towards the issue of mistreatment of Hindus in Russia , again silence over this issue not only from the government but also from right wing BJP which always pretend to be a HIMAYATI of Hindus.

Now this altogether gives a very bad indication that where we are heading towards as a nation , is our voice only left for affluent and rich.

Who would have been a better choice for PM who has complete command over Economics , but does that exempt him from the basic duties that a   PM should perform. He has maintained silence on many many issues he should understand that his stature of mere being a humble person and a successful economist is simply not gonna help here.

I also didn’t like the way he broke the protocol and went to receive Bush on March 1 at the airport . But that’s another issue I don’t wanna get into debate here for god sake.