I’m not certain where to begin with great film James Cameron’s Avatar. I could begin by saying I had waited sitting tight 12 years for this film. I could begin by saying Terminator 2 is my record-breaking most loved motion picture, and I’ve viewed it a thousand times since I was a child. However, I’m going to begin with the best thing I could say. James Cameron is an uncommon movie producer. He altered film-production in the 1980s with The Terminator and Aliens. He did it again in the 1990s with Terminator 2 and Titanic. So following 12 years of expectation and buildup, and all the reports of the record spending plan being some place between a psyche boggling$300 and$500 million, I anticipated that Avatar would be the best thing subsequent to cut bread.
Also, unfortunately, it wasn’t. Way off the mark. I will concede that the visuals in the film were shocking, and at times made you sense that you were imagining. Cameron has certainly invested his energy shrewdly making another universe all his own, and developing an absolutely new world, one that abandons us in wonder. On the other hand, for a producer like Cameron, the entire IMAX 3D component of the film truly wore on me. Before long, I couldn’t hold up to take off those uncomfortable glasses which helps us "see" the shocking visuals, as Cameron needs us to, which are very sickening, especially for a film that is just about three hours long. I’ve never seen a film in 3D or IMAX anytime recently, so I wasn’t certain what’s in store. At the same time, now that I’ve seen it, it makes you wonder, why? Hey Jimmy, you’re James frickin’ Cameron! You needn’t bother with 3D to make great films, man! I feel like 3D is similar to undermining a test that you’ve contemplated for your whole life. Why is Cameron attempting to overcompensate for reasons unknown? He can make heavenly movies with no of this IMAX 3D CGI stuff.