Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

Bajaj Pulsar 200

0 Followers
3.9

Summary

Bajaj Pulsar 200
Prasanth Kumar S R@prasanthsr
Apr 05, 2008 02:27 AM, 4023 Views
Do not mislead :: Pulsar 200 is good for me

I bought a new Pulsar 200 DTS-i on 13th March 2008. Now its covered 1000 kms and 1st service. I’m getting around 44-47 kms per litre, which is not bad. Overall performance is not bad. Breaking and acceleration, I couldnt find any problems yet. I’m usually riding between 60-110 km/hr speed and the bike is good for my use. Oil leacks or shock absorber’s I couldnt find anything bad. Breaking is very good even at 110 km/hr speed and keeps the vehicle balance. Overall I give 9 out of 10 to Pulsar 200 DTS-i.*


I got similar thrilling experience with my Suzuki Shogun (which gives me only 26-30 km/ltr mileage) in 1995 and Hero Honda CBZ (which was better in mileage @ 35-40 km/ltr) in 2000


Compare to those, I’m giving more marks to Pulsar only due to its better performance and new technology.


*I’ve used a lot many biles since 1993


(Suzuki Samurai 1993 - 1995 - 54, 000 Kms.) KL -04 B 1145


(Suzuki Shogun 1995 - 1997 - 34, 000 Kms.) KL 04 C 6660


(Enfield Machismo 1997 - 2000 - 59, 000 Kms.) KL 04 D 4242


(Hero Honda CBZ 2000 - 2002 - 42, 000 Kms.) KL 04 G 8008


(Enfield Bullet 500 2002 - 2008 - 95, 000 Kms.) KL 04 L 3366


(Pulsar 200 DTS-i 2008 -  1, 000 Kms. and running) KL 29 A 1922*


*Other than Enfield ( Cannot compare Enfield with these small bikes :) so given excemption) I prefer Pulsar more.......


(0)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post
Question & Answer