Frankly speeking, 200 is a lonely bike...there isnt a bike in its class to discuss with.
if u wanna compare Karizma to 200, then its ur opinion...u should be comparing 220 to karizma which is tachnically and practically, more better than Karizma..
So stop critisizing the 200, coz if there is another 200 on the street , if there is, then u can compare pulsar 200 to it!
speaking technically about it,
The bikes which are made from may on words, meaning manufactured from may onwards, they are absolutely diffrent from its previous version of 200.
With minor problems, the all new Pulsar 220(manufactured from may) is absolutely the top bike of its class!
speaking of Karizma, its the same old bike which Honda has introduced, and till date didnot change any feature of it!
atleast bajaj is coming up with new bikes with new technology and stuff..
Counting the diffects wont dicrease the good things it has to give...
Its like this...out of 100 students, if 99 students opted for the wrong answer, that wont make the wrong answer right, right?
its the same!
And yeah..the Bike also depends on the rider, how carefully he rides it..