Most of ous think why is the Pulsar-dtsi cheaper than the karizma although having better performance, well after a long study I came to know some points they are- 1.Engine-The engine of the karizma is bigger but due to its weight doesn’t deliver that power, but the weight has a disadvantage with the advantage, that we can discuss later.Although the pulsar-dtsi has a dtsi system but the expense is less than a 50cc more engine. 2.Styling-The body of the karizma is larger than the pulsar(neck is longer)and also looking at it you can see the difference in the body.The alloys in karizma cost more than those rims of the pulsar(you can get alloys of ’’desi’’ quality of Rs3500 at least) the alloys are of the best quality in karizma 3.Digital Metre-The metre some consider to be useless, useless or not useless it costs Rs 9000. 4.Microprocessor-The microprocessor in the engine is also very expensive as well.Technology has its expenses. 5.Comfort-The comfort level of pulsar is great but that of the karizma is a little greater.When you apply the disc in the pulsar it gives you a great hit in the neck but in the karizma the disc is easy on you even if you apply the disc at 100km/h. 6.Trouble at high speeds-The karizma though a top speed less than the Pulsar-dtsi(Though 2km/h can easily be increased by a little petrol adjustment)but even at high speed you can feel the karizma to be very stable, but in the case of the pulsar-dtsi at high speeds it is very unsteady and cause serious injury, this all is due to the fact that karizma is heavier than the pulsar-dtsi 7.Long term use-the engine of the karizma being larger has a longer lifetime. In all I want to say is Pulsar-dtsi+steady performance+better technology+better styling=The Karizma thus conclusion Karizma>pulsar-dtsi so, Pulsar-dtsi=Rs62000 and Karizma=Rs79000 though pulsar-dtsi is a great bike but please don’t compare it with the Karizma