Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×
W. Khan@Mr_Right
Aug 18, 2008 07:39 PM, 1654 Views
(Updated Aug 18, 2008)
THE CELLULAR CARRIER RACKET

Everyone


knows the quality of cellular reception EVERYWHERE is at best pretty damn


SHITTY! Every time we push the green button, one gambles on whether the call


will a). Go through, b). Survive long enough to satisfactorily complete the


call, and c). The transmission and reception of audio signals would be


reasonably clear.


But,


chances are, to connect with the cellular signal, one finds himself involved in


bizarre gyrations and acrobatic posturing that could amaze a circus


contortionist! And instead of getting paid for the Oscar winning performance,


you end up paying the ‘phone company for the opportunity to audition before


nonentities.


All


kidding aside, just consider this: Your few seconds of “Hello … Hello … Can you


hear me?” costs you a full minute for the call. If you make two or three such


calls in the same minute period, you end up paying for the full minute for each


call regardless; and their billing clock adjusts itself accordingly. I once


obtained credit from Hutch for International calls abruptly disconnected within


the first couple of minutes of making the call; provided I called the same


number immediately and spoke for more than two minutes! Pretty generous, eh?


But they socked it to me real good come time to close my Post-paid account and


reclaim my deposit.


Note that


these “Deposits”(for Post-paid accounts) should really not be necessary since


such accounts are established based upon Trust, Credit, and backed by verified information on the consumer’s employment,


financial, residential, personal info., photograph, reference data and credit


history. In effect, these “Deposits” function as a “credit umbrella” within


limits of which calls are allowed to be made.


So for all practical purposes, a


“Post-paid” account functions almost similarly to a “Pre-paid” account but


where the cellular carrier reaps benefit of your money throughout your


relationship and, upon termination, gets to make “appropriate” deductions


before returning the balance to you without paying any interest! **There’s


something very shady in this arrangement, wouldn’t you say**?


Conspiracy


theories, i.e., whether weak cellular signals are the anticipated outcome of a


deliberately engineered inconsistent and sub-standard FM infrastructure is of


relevance here! The fact is, the ‘cell phone establishments are continuing to benefit


from the glitches indigenous to their system and raking in the big bucks unbeknown


to most tolerant(or gullible) consumers.


Granted, we


are not reliant on a cellular monopoly. There’s healthy competition evident


here so the “Buyer Beware” consumer admonition should hold relevance and be


applicable, Right? NOT SO! In a consumer


environment such as ours that supports an unreliable medium for auditory


communication across the board, and a uniform, parsimonious standard of


business ethics relative to refunds, there’s no real benefit in changing your


cellular carrier.


The only


recourse I see is a united, vociferous consumer outcry, “ENOUGH IS ENOUGH”! Backed by a


stiff, aggressive class action law suit, as a matter of principle, to


rightfully reclaim the moneys we spent on such substandard calls made under


unavoidable compulsion and duress. This will most certainly jump start the


“Powers That Be” into a responsible, ethical consumer relationship providing


honest value for money.


Are there


any consumer lawyers out there willing to take on the giants and champion the


rightful cause of the little man? C’mon …There’s gotta be someone out there


with pluck?! Or have the 99% truly given the remaining 1% a bad name?

(0)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post
Question & Answer