I have used this software while I was thinking about when we start my YouTube channel.
As a beginner, I was thinking to have a platform of something I can use it for Editing part. I have also used Blander previously, and it also has the feature of editing but, their editing feature is too hard and complex for a normal person to understand. Actually, I have used this blender application for only the animation part and not for editing part. In order to do editing thing on Blender, the user have to go for the special courses on YouTube or any other learning platform.
Basically, as a user, I would suggest to doesn’t use Blender as an Editing part. Because, as per, like, an animation course is worthy for a person if he/she wants to do animation on or learn animation as his/her hobby. So, they can go to learn animation and use blender application for that. But, if the user has to learn Editing too from somewhere and implement it, then it’s not worthy. Because, when I have started with editing my videos then I have so much less time and also, as per my suggestions, I don’t have to understand or have to learn editing part with all of this.
So, I moved to the second software of editing, I got, this, Filmora one as more easy UI(User Interface) one to check out the entire software features or navigations. It has many transitions and all and also to the pages, that is, what we use when we use multiple images, and also for the text. It gives users a better animation for executing and implementing their videos as they like. Many more advantages are also there, like, easy drag and drop feature of various videos and also with the slider option which we can use text anytime and anywhere.
Now, of course, if a product has an advantage then it will also have disadvantages. The only disadvantage that I have found is it’s watermark. What "Filmora" is doing that giving the entire features to use is free and when we deploy it like when we make it to export the videos, then, after exporting or rendering the entire video, it will show watermark at large in between. And, in order to remove it, user has to buy their subscription package. The point is, this is the best practice of doing marketing and increasing their revenue point of thing.
But, we also have other video editing softwares in market, so simply the user will move to other platforms. Because there are other softwares as well for video editing in markets that actually give watermarks, but they have conditions.
Conditions what I have faced are:
1- They can give watermark size very small that no one has even noticed and at the bottom corner.
2- If user wants to remove the watermark completely, then, there is an option of seeing advertisements. Like, in "Inshot" Video Editing Mobile Application, we have the option of cancelling the watermark with seeing the advertisement.
So, user has to buy their subscription package in order to use their software. The basic fact like, if they give more features as well and it’s okay. Like, subscription package comes with some extra features as well. But, "Filmora" only removes watermark when user bought their subscription package. So, for a user point of view, it’s too low. Like, there are when software which actually gives more features while when user will buy their subscription packages.
In conclusion, this video editing software is only usable when, and only when the user will buy their subscription package. I have alternatives, of "Filmora" and basically give me more efficient video editing features rather than "Filmora", some are, Blender, (yes, I have used blender for video editing, because of first I have used "Filmora" but because of it’s free and then buy thing, I actually shift to Blender) "OpenShot", "InShot", etc.
I’m using "Inshot" currently for editing my videos.