My dear friends it is not a bad topic to discuss upon since the indian team hasnt won a single triangular series since march 2002(shameful isnt it) and the players havent hesitated a bit to act in ads (atleast 50 since then).
it is true that the great sachin tendulkar has scored 38 centuries in odis alone.it is truly a marvellous feat.but if you notice closely , you will see that all the indian cricket players are selfish to the core.but I must admit that his recent centuries heve come in almost a run a ball fashion.
look at the australians , they dont slow down a bit when they come near to scoring a century. but the indians, oh no they will decelarate, they dont care whether the team loses or wins but they want to have an additional century added to their respective careers.(even if they waste several balls)
i dont say that there are no selfish players in the other teams . there are, but very rarely one can come across such players
matthew hayden once said that some of the indian players are very selfish they play only for their career and not for their team.
team india has been very competetive to maintain its rankings below the top six since the last few years, they want to get close to bangladesh.the person mainly responsible for this has been awarded the rank 1 at the end of this review.
he is the super waste player and he must be awarded worst cricketer ever.
the five worst cricketers have been chosen even though there only one great idiot in the team who has been mainly responsible for the recent defeats of india in the past two - three years.
5)rahul dravid: he has been referred to as mr.wall.i truly admire his talent to remain at the crease for a long time .but at what cost?he is very very slow and doesnt hit too much.(not an arrogant but an unassuming
player though, much much better than dada)
4)vvs laxman: he is unfit for the ODIs. he is accustomed to the slower version of the game hence only for tests.(not arrogant)
3)dinesh mongia: this guy is too much to bear. he may not be selfish like ganguly nor arrogant like him, but too mild.
2)gautam gambhir: this guy doesnt make any impact on the opposition.succumbs under pressure.
5, 4, 3, 2 have been chosen because of the title five worst cricketers(even though there is only one)
1) SOURAV GANGULY: THE MOST selfish , mannerless and arrogant person team india ever possessed.(removed his shirt when india won in 2002. I wonder what else he would remove if india won another series).
this guy thinks too much about himself.
whenever india wins he thinks he is responsible for it though he must remember that his contribution is the least.
when india beat pakistan in the world cup 2003 it was because he was out for a duck otherwise he would have wasted several balls and india would have lost that match too.he did his bit that day by making way for dravid, kaif, yuvraj.
several commentators describe ganguly as a dangerous player but I feel that ganguly is dangerous to india itself and not to the opposition.
when it is india vs any team india is playing with 10 players and opposition with 12(ganguly playing on their side)
that day for getting 10000 runs he scored 51 runs out of 110 balls. infact if he was out for a duck or so india would have had a greater chance to win because he wouldnt have wasted so many balls.
that day against west indies , ganguly scored 2 out of 12 balls and fortunately he had to retire because of which yuvraj and kaif got enough balls because of which india won.
unfortunately this fool mr. ganguly has been made the captain again .
i wonder why the icc banned ganguly for 6 matches. he should have been banned for atleast 60 matches.
he cant bat(wastes too many balls if he has to score a two digit score)
he cant bowl properly( too many noballs and wides)
he cant field(he cant field when a ball comes into his hands)
what will india do with a donkey as a captain
sehwag, dravid, bhajji anyone is better than ganguly
ganguly should make way for a youngster like darren lehmann did for micheal clarke even though he was playing well.
i am sorry but this is the truth.