This is incredeball movie in 2016 this bast movie but copy 1995 movie full copy? this is bast
The movie, which opens on 3, 900 screens across the country on Friday, didn’t screen for critics in most domestic markets. Some foreign critics have already weighed in, and a handful of Los Angeles critics appear to have found their way into the movie’s big premiere earlier this week, but for all practical purposes it’s opening cold.
That’s nearly unprecedented for a movie of this size. It’s hard to think of many comparable films that weren’t screened for critics in advance: As Scott Mendelson points out at Forbes, the closest comparisons are probably the 2014 Hercules movie starring Dwayne Johnson, and 2009’s G.I. Joe: Rise of the Cobra, a$175 million film based on a toy line that wasn’t quite the successful franchise starter it was obviously intended to be.
Declining to screen a film for critics before release is usually a pretty strong sign that the movie isn’t any good — or at least that the studio believes critics won’t like it.(Although some early reviews of Independence Day: Resurgence do appear to be relatively kind.) It can also be read as a signal that with a presold, megabudget sequel like this, the studio’s marketing team thinks critics simply don’t matter: It’s an Independence Day sequel. Your decision to buy a ticket won’t have anything to do with whether a critic liked it or not.
Lots of critics will end up reviewing the film anyway, of course. But they’ll have to line up and buy tickets like everyone else, then post their reviews over the weekend, or even early next week.
Maybe that’s a good thing. Preview screenings are both an enticing perk for critics and a valuable part of any reviewing gig. But they also tend to separate critics from ordinary viewers and insulate them from the typical theatrical experience, which often pushes critics into offering judgments rather than leading conversations.