Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

JetLite

0 Followers
2.3

Summary

JetLite
manjit handa@manjit
Dec 09, 2002 04:41 PM, 8383 Views
(Updated Dec 09, 2002)
Sahara



  1. I had a very unpleasant experience with sahara airlines recently




which leads me to believe that this company follows the following


policy:-


a. Talk big.


B. Act small.


C. Use discount offers to attract the customer and then execute a


rip-off.


D. If someone complains, talk big, act small and hold on for dear life


to the rip-off.




  1. At the pune ticketing office, I purchased a discount offer ticket




for rs 2500 for my wife to fly from delhi to pune. This was apparently


a good deal because one was flying for rs 2500 only against a normal


fare of rs 5999. However, such a discount is available only for 25 days


in advance on a firm booking. Another restriction that I was informed


about was that the ticket was non-refundable and I could make only one


preponement or postponement within 15 days of travel. Fair enough.


Incidently, there was a brochure pinned up on a notice board at the


ticketing office with details of the discount fare plan. When I asked


if I could have a copy, I was informed that it was only for the office


use and not for customers.




  1. As it happened, my wife had to advance her flight due to some urgent




work. Since there were less than 15 days to go, the airline could only


change the reservation on payment of:-


(a) a full fare (rs 6999)


(b) minus the rs 2500 already paid


(c) plus a rs 500 penalty.




  1. Upto this point, I wasn’t aware of this ’’plus rs 500 penalty’’. The




airline staff at pune where I had purchased the ticket had never


informed me either verbally or in writing about this penalty.




  1. Secondly, the harassment. My wife was expected to go to connaught




place at the sahara office in delhi to get the ticket duly changed at


the earliest. I asked if she couldn’t do this on the day of the flight


itself at the airport ticketing counter by paying the difference of


fare, if you could make a notation of the changes on your computerised


ticketing system ? A big no. Once again, the airline staff at pune


where I had purchased the ticket had never informed me either verbally


or in writing about this procedure. This was definitely an avoidable


piece of travel, considering that one full day was wasted in getting to


connaught place and back.




  1. I made a short complaint on the sahara website through an e-mail.




After about a week, ( talk about speedy customer-care !) I received a


call from a middle-level manager who started with a fair effort to


understand my complaint and then an offer of apology in writing for the


mistake made by the ticketing staff at pune in not informing me about


the rs 500 penalty. This was followed by a big lecture on the economics


of discount fares and the big favour being done by the sahara airlines


to the indian public, not to mention the security risks involved in


issuing tickets anywhere except at the connaught place office. I got


the feeling that sahara assumes every passenger to be a potential


suicide-bomber or an aircraft-hijacker, unless his or her body-language


can be properly observed and analysed at the connaught place ticketing


office? The lecture made me feel that the victim in this whole episode


was not me but sahara airlines.




  1. What is at stake here? Firstly, a rs 500 penalty. Is it a big




amount? Well no. But wait a minute. Although this appears to be a minor


sum, it seems important enough to the airline which levied the penalty


in the first place! Then why should it not be important enough for me?


And at the point when I was informed of the penalty, I was totally at


the mercy of the airline....either pay the rs 500 penalty or lose the


entire rs 2500. Do you see the rip-off, and the petty attitude behind


this whole set-up? Secondly, what is the logic of this penalty? Is


there any loss to the airline if I change the date of travel? No. Is


that the administrative cost of issuing another piece of paper? Mr.


Middle manager’s argument was precisely that. ’’it takes money to


maintain the wide area network servers, you know’’. Further, in this age


of computerised reservations, one expects online handling of one’s


requirements through phone or on the internet to avoid unnecessary


trips on the road. Is it not possible to cancel one’s booking of a


ticket on the phone and pick up another from the airport on the day of


travel? Or does the airline just derive sadistic pleasure in making the


passenger travel all the way to connaught place?




  1. I refuse to believe mr middle manager’s explanation that the




ticketing staff at the pune counter made an honest mistake in not


informing me in advance about the rs 500 penalty. I also refuse to


believe that the ticketing staff at the pune counter made an honest


mistake in not providing me a pamphlet on the terms and conditions of


the discount deal. Well, I did ask for that and that was exactly i


didn’t get since there was apparently only one pin-up copy for office


use and none for the customers. The way I see it, it is a well-known


business practice ( as learnt by our mbas coached in highbrow


american-style business schools) to not reveal the unattractive parts


of a deal especially when one is talking about an otherwise attractive


package. I have a feeling that the staff is quite properly coached in


what and how much to reveal or conceal. The trick is to tell only the


attractive parts of the deal when money is being initially committed by


the customer, and leave the unsavoury parts for later, if the customer


ever finds out, when he is anyway in a no-win situation. That’s why,


these customer-repelling penalty clauses either never appear in print


on the ticket or are not pointed out to you specifically. The


conditions of contract that appear on the ticket are about other


general minor inconveniences, and even those are heavily loaded in


favour of the airline to help it wriggle out of every conceivable


sticky situation whether of their own making or not, including one...


And I really like this ... In which if they book extra passengers by


mistake, they have every right to haul you out of the aircraft by the


scruf of your neck and dump you on the tarmac (with a letter of apology


later on, if you really want it, buddy) but no promises of monetary


compensation.... Wouldn’t you love to have that experience?




  1. My basic point is this. A customer often has a subterranean desire




not to be considered a nitpicking, small-minded, cheapster...


Quibbling over petty sums and minor inconveniences when dealing with a


nice big friendly airline, with charming ’’lucy’’ at the front office,


hence one shies away from making an issue. The big companies make money


from you by doing exactly that...by being nitpicking, small-minded and


cheap...all by hiding behind the charming ’’lucy’’ at the front office.


(that’s why charming lucy got the job in the first place). They offer


you small-printed, unreasonable and one-sided terms of contract that


you can do nothing about. As the companies see it, the onus of being


fully informed of the terms of contract is upon the customer and not


upon the airline. And if they are confronted with the details, they


play hide and seek by unloading the blame upon hapless lucy for not


doing her job too well. Put lucy on the tarmac!

(2)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post
Question & Answer