Throughout showing secondary school sophomores for a long time, I have perused Julius Caesar more than thirty circumstances, and I never become sick of its wealth of detail or the intricacy of its characters.
Practically consistently, I wind up making a similar basic inquiry - "Whom improve? Cassius or Brutus?"- - and practically consistently my answer is not quite the same as what it was the prior year.
On one hand, we have Cassius, the narrow minded, manipulative plotter who, after the death, shows himself to be an indiscreet, faithful companion and a capable government official, and, then again, Brutus, the reliable scholarly and mate of the republic who gets to be, under the heaviness of his blame, an irritatingly careful moralist and a clumsy general more worried with notoriety than achievement. And after that obviously there is Antony: splendid, horrendous, corrupt, and at last as mysterious as a tornado.
This is an awesome play about legislative issues and human character