Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

Lata Mangeshkar

0 Followers
4.6

Summary

Lata Mangeshkar
Ajay P@ajay55
Oct 10, 2004 10:10 PM, 8692 Views
(Updated Oct 10, 2004)
LATA, LP a Magnificent Magnitudinous Association.

Setting Lata’s L-P record straight


When a very close relationship turns bitter, two factors are


always present. One, the utter futility and avoid ability of the


split, which is invariably due to an ego-clash, and two, the


sheer intensity of the negative feelings, at least on one side,


as the emotional pendulum swings and get locked on the other


extreme.


And this is what took place, a few years ago, between Lata


Mangeshkar and Laxmikant-Pyarelal.


Look at how L-P and their role and their songs in Latabai’s


career   have been marginalised in her recent concerts and


compilations. Look at how chroniclers loyal   to   her   are


misguidedly undermining the enormous role L-P have played in


Lata’s career between 1963’s Parasmani and 1996’s Prem Granth.


One is led to think that L-P hardly mattered in Lata’s musical


life. But such a magnificent and magnitudinous association cannot


just be brushed away by bias, or wished away by the magic wand of


expediency. And L-P and Lata were a longer, larger, closer and


more rewarding association that than what ANY composer has had


with ANY singer in Hindi cinema.


Their mutual admiration society was formed in the 50s when L and


P were struggling musicians whom Lata then recommended to top


composers like Shanker-Jaikishan and SD Burman. For a while L-P


even stayed with the Mangeshkar family, and had formed a


performing musical group called Surel Kala Kendra with Lata’s


sister Usha and brother Hridaynath. When they got their first


break, it was with Lata Mangeshkar that L-P recorded their first


song (for an aborted film called Tumse Pyar Ho Gaya ). That was


in 1962.


In the next 35 years, Lata and L-P were to chalk up an astounding


700 songs together, which accounted for one in every 10 Hindi


film songs recorded by the Melody Queen, and one of every four


songs composed by the duo. And but for the bitterness, it is safe


to assume that L-P would have chalked up a still higher tally.


And what a mind boggling variety and range did we get in those 700


numbers which included chart-slammers and classics, and chaalu


numbers as well as connoisseur choices. It is impossible to find


that variety and that sustained excellence without monotony in


the output of any other composer, with Lata or with any other


singer.


’’We are so besotted by her, ’’ remembers Pyarelal, ’’that we could


not look beyond Lataji, whether it was for the heroine, the vamp


or a child artiste. She would go out of her way too, even singing


cabarets for us (as in Intequam), reducing her fees and adjusting


her dates. Hamari success mein Lataji ka 50 per cent se zyaada


haath hai!’’ His late partner Laxmikant would often talk about how


Pyarelal and he would fork out money from their own pockets if


the producers of their early small films could not afford


Latabai. ’’In the mid-60s, Latabai even kept seven recording days


in a month only for us, which boosted the producers’ confidence


in us, ’’ recalled the late composer.


And Lata wasn’t doing this merely out of friendship. In L-P she


sensed the potential to be Shanker-Jaikishan’s successors. She


saw in their music the same blend of popular appeal, musical


substance, range and prolificity. In return, L-P uninterruptedly


gave her a fantastic array of dazzlers for over three decades and


even quit Gulzar’s Meera (for loyal producer Premji) when Lata,


for her own reasons, opted out of the project. ’’How would we


dream of composing such a subject without Latabai?’’ asked


Laxmikant simply. A few years earlier, the war between Raj Kapoor


and the Melody Queen simply had to be ended before L-P entered


the RK portals for Bobby. How else could the Lata-inspired Raj


Kapoor dream, Satyam Shivam Sundaram have been realised? L-P by


then had more than vindicted Lata’s faith and her unstinted


support.


And if Laxmikant often said, ’’Latabai could even convert a char-


aana song to a one-rupee one, ’’ he also admitted ruefully that


their own phenomenal contribution to her career had never got its


due. ’’All the learned people who wrote about music never


spotlighted the 100 per cent truth that we gave her the kind of


variety no other composer did. Neither did HMV, who repeatedly


highlighted her songs with other composers who never experimented


her sheer versatility and voice in the way Pyare and I always


did.’’


How then did this bond turn bitter? Said Laxmikant then, ’’By the


mid-’80s, Latabai had begun to do a lot of shows abroad. At first


we would get her songs dubbed and then wait for her. But in that


video era the producers soon began to see no point in the extra


expense. So though we still reserved ourbest for her - like Yeh


ishq dunk bicchhua ka in Batwara and the Nagina and Ram Lakhan


numbers, we did begin to record extensively with Kavita, Alka and


Anuradha Paudwal. And it was not our fault that most of our songs


which these young singers proved hits and other music directors


were also emboldened to work with them! In this line there are


always malicious elements who are looking for a chance to poison


friends against each other. Maybe vested interests told her that


we were deliberately not working with her. So though there was no


fight or argument, we just drifted apart...’’


But the break-up proved calamitous for both, much as Lata’s fans


would like to believe otherwise. In the post L-P phase of her


career, Lata Mangeshkar has had consistent hits, but   the


substantial songs among them can be counted on our fingers. As


for Laxmikant-Pyarelal, the men who decimated all opposition with


Lata’s support for over three decades, they simply lost the will


to compete even with comparative greenhorns. Today there is only


a priceless L-P-Lata treasury to fall back on, and the loss to


film music and film music lovers (being now irreparable after


Laxmikant’s   death and Pyarelal’s indecision on whether to


continue) is nothing less than catastrophic.


But if L-P worshipped her enough to give her those hundreds of


divine compositional offerings, which have stood the test of time


and politics, Lata’s own intense and calculated indifference to


L-P also shows that in the core of her heart, she actually


realises what they meant to each other. She knows that L-P are


the very last composers she will be able to erase from both, her


famous memory and her even more renowned ouevre. Only that


explains the degree of her aversion to give L-P their rightful


place in her own glorious innings.


And if, only for history’s sake, we must both entreat her and


hope that she sets her own L-P record straight!

(5)
VIEW MORE
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post
Question & Answer