Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

Motorola C168

0 Followers
3.7

Summary

Motorola C168
mohit gupta@guptachi
Aug 21, 2006 08:07 PM, 2114 Views
Value for money but low on performance

I had a nokia 2100 which finally conked after years of roughuse and had to buy a phone in emergency and the shopkeeper suggested C168 as areplacement.


phone is good looking no doubt (specially for the price) but by trying to loadextra features - motorola has compromised on one good features which makes thisfeature good : phone book memory (600 odd entries) which is extremely slow toretrieve nos ....


rest is ok except the durability of the back cover (too plasticky) is a lildubious.....!!


for low priced phones I had still recommend nokia phones which are low on looksbut great speed. for low priced phones I had still recommend nokia phones whichare low on looks but great speed. for low priced phones I had still recommendnokia phones which are low on looks but great speed. for low priced phones Ihad still recommend nokia phones which are low on looks but great speed.

(2)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post

Recommended Top Articles

Question & Answer