Very poor writing - misleading titleI have read this book after getting it from flip kart. I bought this book because of title and thought will have some important history work. but sorry to say, kamleshwar has just put some of his bakwas thoughts. I would like to put some points and seek answer from write-
Why he has targeted bhrahma and other hindu gods only to prove them character less. what about targetting hazrat for marryihng a 6 year old girl? From which authenticated source he got those information? Is he trying to prove points from congress eyes or sell his book among muslims?
he says before tulsidas ram was not there. there was not any temple at ayodhya? did he look into the fact and excavation of the sight and points in high court judgement?
he says ram is only a myth then from where he his trying to prove ram did adharma by killing dambook and what he is trying to prove hindusim as most dirty religion?
when he talks about islam he says islam is good but people made it bad. but when he talks and give references about hinduism he directly said hinduism is bad thats why temples got broken? what point he wants to prove?
total book is full of foolish ideas.
how this book got sahitya academy? was it given in ruling of congress and minority appeasement and because it abuses hinduism.