I had high expectations for Robert T. Kiyosaki’s Rich Dad, Poor Dad, as I suspected it would give a significant knowledge into individual budget and establishing financial stability. Nonetheless, I was painfully disheartened.
Most importantly, Kiyosaki’s story of a "rich dad" and a "poor dad" is excessively oversimplified and verges on dream. It infers that becoming rich is exclusively a question of embracing a specific outlook or keeping a bunch of erratic guidelines. This isn’t simply offending to the people who battle monetarily because of fundamental disparities, yet in addition by and large perilous counsel that might prompt unfortunate direction and dangerous ventures.
In addition, Kiyosaki’s accentuation on land as a definitive establishing financial stability vehicle is extremist and ridiculous. Not every person has the assets or interest in seeking after land adventures, and depending on this as a widespread system ignores the complicated real factors of the cutting edge economy.
Furthermore, Kiyosaki’s recommendation on monetary schooling and contributing is much of the time unclear and conflicting. He proposes facing challenges and utilizing obligation, yet neglects to recognize the genuine dangers of losing cash or causing impractical obligation. This can leave perusers powerless against monetary ruin and frustration.
Generally speaking, I tracked down Rich Dad, Poor Dad to be a disheartening and possibly hurtful book. It presents a misrepresented and intolerant way to deal with individual accounting that can prompt ridiculous assumptions and unfortunate independent direction. In that capacity, I can’t prescribe it to anybody looking for real monetary schooling and exhortation.