Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

Samsung X700

0 Followers
4.1

Summary

Samsung X700
Rajesh Pandey@simply.rpandey897153
Jul 10, 2006 06:49 PM, 3926 Views
(Updated Sep 11, 2006)
Value for money

This mobile is really value for money. It doesn’t have gr8 looks of Moto Razer-V3i but yes it has really good feature set. If you don’t give more weightage on looks but features, then it is an appropriate choice. Before buying X700 I did a research on all the phone in the range 8k-14k INR, with non-funky decent look. Earlier I had NOKIA-2300.


Here are the features which I was looking for:


Nice colors, Nice displays: The display is much better compared to Moto series.


FM: Most of the phones in this range don’t have FM except nokia-7260/7360 (don’t have bluetooth or funky looking), 6230i (screen too small), 3230 (not goot at holding it for a long time, camera quality not good) and sony ericsson walkman series (looks funky). But Sony ericsson 750i has even better sound quality :-)


Camera quality: I took picture/video from both razer v3i and x700 and uploaded on laptop. You can really make the difference in terms of clarity. It’s really good in X700.


Bluetooth: Few mobiles in this range don’t have bluetooth. I found this feature very useful.


Easy to use: I found it very easy to use. Sound reception is also really good. Much ahead from motorola mobiles here. Sony is also comparable.


It doesn’t crashes like Nokia-2300, pretty stable.


Cons:


i. Flash could have been included in it.


ii. It becomes a bit slow when you have large size external tflash.


iii. Battery life less compared to Nokia phones


iv. You can not have your incoming alert as ’both vibration and ringing at a time’ the feature which I find very useful. :-(


v. It does not support more than 64 songs in the playlist. :-(


I am attaching few snaps from my mobile.


(0)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post
Question & Answer