The questions asked by Oak seem to be logical , and the modern scholars need to answer these one by one. P.N.Oak’s contentions should be approved or disapproved on the force of reason, facts only . It does not matter what caste, class, community , organisation , qualification , group ( Left , Right , Front ) he belonged to. All that should be considered is what is worth acceptable within the ambit of historical reasons. History makes a nation , it may destroy it too.
I wonder why for last many years, historians have not discussed this issue to arrive at a conclusion where no room is left to agree to disagree. For how long historians will play as toys in the hands of lesser politicians who weigh politics always above history.
Dr. J.R.S., VNS