The Hangover was one of the most successful comedies released in recent times, and Part 2, brings the four characters known as the ’Wolfpack’ together for a series of adventures in Bangkok. This time, they end up going to Thailand for Stu’s wedding, and yet again wake up having no clue what has happened, and have lost Stu’s future brother in law to boot!
For much of the first half, I laughed a lot, in some cases the jokes being even funnier than the original Hangover. However, the film falls flat as it draws towards an inevitable climax, and even the humour of the last scenes seems rather forced (as is the cameo of a well known personality). The major problem of the Hangover Part II is that with the plot being almost a carbon copy of Part I, the element of suspense that was such a highlight of the first movie has been lost and you can predict the ending, as well as the actions of the characters about 20 minutes before the film ends.
Also, one wished that the filmmakers had shown some more imagination given the appeal of three buddies lost in Bangkok in an alien environment and a different culture. Yet apart from some stunning visuals of the Thai beaches and a few isolated scenes, the film does not really make us feel a sense of place and context given its similarity to the pattern of events in the Hangover Part 1.
That said, Part II remains an entertaining film, as we laugh with, at, and eventually empathise with the comical situations that our three friends find themselves in. Zach Galfilinakas is the funniest of the lot, his scenes with the monkey and petty rivalry with Stu’s brother in law (Mason Lee) particular highlights. The monkey is just brilliant and spontaneous, yet rather underused given its potential antics. Ed Helms has a bigger role this time and makes the most of it, while Cooper does not have as much to do this time round. Unfortunately Doug (Justin Bartha) is merely a spectator, and the film’s leading ladies are relegated to blink and miss roles. Ken Joeng is quite hilarious as the ’international criminal’. Paul Giammati is wasted.
The music fits in well with the events of the movie, and the cinematography for the most part is really effective. Where the Hangover Part II falls flat is the repetitive use of situations and jokes which undermines its true potential. It could be said that this is one of the laziest, cash-grabbing sequels that you will see this year. In spite of that, it still entertains.
Verdict: Above Average
Rating: 7.25/10