My fiero is now 8 months old. Let me describe what actual Fiero F2 is
No doubt it has good height , length and it has removed major flaws from previous feiro , but still lacks in few points.
1 ) No fifth gear, It is required because as you are riding feiro f2 on 4 gear you still feel that there is still one more gear to be switched on. But when you try you find they are all finished. You find comfortable only at a speed above 60 -70 on 4 th gear. But what I think is 5th gear is required in fiero f2.
2 ) You fill like you are pulling the vehicle hard but in Pulsar it feels like it Pulls you leaving you with less stress. Now this point can be considered for its Luxury. I have given a test ride with Pulsar, CBZ. In drive ( luxury ) I treat Pulsar as first, CBZ as second and then Feiro f2. I have got even Kawasaki Bajaj . I do get more smoothness on bajaj rather than on fiero f2. You have to try hard with accelerator in fiero f2 to move forward as compared to other vehicle. ( Here I don’t speak about Pick Up but I am stressing on Accelerator and its associated parts )
3 ) Design aspect, I still feel it needs more improvement, Pulsar has brought a new aspect of design in motorbike. What I can say is SATISFIED with current design in fiero f2.
4 ) Seat is too hard than compared with other bikes. Not at all comfortable for long drives. Back starts paining. Please dont try for long drives.
Good Points :
1 ) Good pick up. This is what I wanted.
2 ) Good Height and feels like I am driving some different vehicle than compared to other.
3 ) Can accelerate to maximum within less time as compared to other bikes.
Fuel Effeciency : 45- 47 Km/litre ( City )
If someone asks me which bikes should I prefer. I would suggest him to consider bikes in this points
1 ) Pulsar
then go for
2 ) CBZ
then go for
3 ) FEIRO F2