Your review is Submitted Successfully. ×

iRiver U10

0 Followers
1.3

Summary

iRiver U10
Dheeraj Nagpal@Dheerajnagpal
Oct 28, 2007 01:41 PM, 5149 Views
Don't burn your money on this.

I purchased this product from Amazon after a long wait. My friends had

hyped up so much about the sound quality et al of iRiver that I choose

to wait for about a month, checking online everyday for this product to

become available. Here goes my small and distasteful experience with

this product.

I

ordered it on 2nd of Feb and amazon said it would be delivered by 15th

- 17th. Firstly Amazon never takes that long. I have bought products worth$3000 to$4000 and always it has been delivered earlier than the expected date. This product was the only exception in both the timing of delivery as well as the quality. Anyways, it landed on my place on 17th, and since I had been

waiting for this product for so long, it already raised my expectations

a lot.

When I opened the package and copied songs on the player

with some difficulty(Mind it, the documentation is in a lot of

languages but quality is horrible) the quality of sound or the output

was no way better than an IPod. In-fact, on the default output

settings, the music player on my Krazr on a speakerphone beats this

player hands down. This is not an exaggaration as there are a few songs

that I have, and there are sounds in those songs that were audible on

Krazr but not on iRiver even though I tried all the presets. Those

sounds do exist as I can hear them in my PC on winamp. The SRS WOW settings help though. I used it for half an hour and realized

that the build quality was shoddy.

For the

earphones, when I increased the volume, the sound leaked a lot from the

earphones and enabling SRS WOW() on the player introduced a hiss.

Frankly speaking, I was so disappointed with the quality that next weekend, I went out and bought Sandisk Sansa e280.

Then

something good happened finally with iRiver, I have a pair of about 12

year old earphones from my Aiwa walkman and used them instead of the

original earphones of iRiver. The difference in quality was huge and

there wasn’t any leakage. All iRiver has to do to make this product

better is to give a better pair of earphones.

Well, they say

good things don’t last for long. Exactly one month after the purchase

(28 days to be precise as it was Feb), clix stopped working totally. It wouldn’t even

start. I reset it but of no use. Next day, it turned on for a second

and showed low battery and turned off. I tried charging it but of no

use. According to iRiver, I had charged it with a high voltage than

specified and the product was fine though I had been using the same USB

port for charging my MotoRazr, Moto Krazr and now Sandisk Sansa for

over a year in totaly and no other product had any issues. In-fact two months ago, I went out to buy two more MP3 players of the Sansa family.

My

cousin is an electronics engineer and I asked him to see if he can do

something of my Clix. He opened it and confirmed that the charging unit

was short. There was no name on the IC so I cannot buy a new one from

market and replace it.

There was one more shocking observation

though, the MP3 processing unit on this product is a Samsung chip. Any

thoughts on why a Samsung MP3 player will not give the same quality of

output as compared to iRiver Clix.

Lastly, just a

recommendation. Dont burn your money on this product, there are enough

good products out there. If you like the look and feel of this product, go and buy Cowon products. If you are looking for good sound quality, buy an Ipod or Sansa.

(0)
Please fill in a comment to justify your rating for this review.
Post

Recommended Top Articles

Question & Answer