I am writing to share my recent experience with the KPMG Global Services recruitment process, specifically for the position of Associate Director in the Technology Services department. My joining date was scheduled for November 2023, and the entire process spanned approximately four months until the offer was released.
During this extensive period, I underwent two job changes. The first was with NNN consultancy services, where I left due to a significant mismatch in the job profile. Despite formally resigning, I did not serve the notice period and did not obtain an experience letter. The second job was with SSS, a reputable product company, offering a good job profile but with a package less competitive than what KPMG had offered.
Throughout the KPMG selection process, I transparently communicated to the recruiter about my previous consultancy company, NNN, explaining that I left on less than favorable terms and lacked an experience letter. Initially, the recruiter highlighted potential issues with Background Verification(BGV) if I were selected. In response, I expressed my hesitations and made it clear that I would not proceed under these circumstances. However, the recruiter later informed me that the management had granted approval, and there would be no BGV concerns related to NNN.
KPMG typically conducts BGV checks before the joining date, a standard practice. In my case, I insisted on resigning from SSS only after the BGV was successfully cleared to avoid surprises later on. However, the recruiter disagreed, claiming it would be too late to resign once the BGV was completed. Despite spending four months on the recruitment process, the recruiter urged me to resign from SSS without waiting for the BGV results.
Regrettably, I agreed and resigned from SSS, trusting the recruiter’s assurance that everything was in order. To my dismay, a month later, the recruiter informed me that my BGV had failed, citing negative feedback from NNN as the reason. This revelation left me jobless, having believed in the recruiter’s earlier assurance that the matter with NNN had been resolved.
I share this review not only to express my disappointment but also as a cautionary tale for fellow candidates considering opportunities at KPMG. My intent is to encourage individuals to exercise caution and seek written confirmation from the recruitment team before making any decisions, learning from the mistake I made.
If you or someone you know is contemplating a role at KPMG, I strongly advise approaching the opportunity with caution and ensuring clarity in all communications with the recruitment team.
Thank you for taking the time to read my experience.