Eons ago when I upgraded my monitor from monochrome to colour, it was THE most exciting upgrade of that era. Flickering screen was probably not even acknowledged as major drawback of monitors of that era since a comparison was not possible with anything else. Now we have LCD monitors, which practically exhibit no flicker at all, hence, the comparison.
Flicker is by far a major drawback in CRT monitors and many users not knowing that the default is usually set at 60 Hz continue to suffer with eyestrain and subsequently headaches, thus reducing their quality time in front of their screens.
I had previously been using a Samsung 700IFT which was a 17’’’’ monitor but having very good specifications. 1600 x 1200 max resolution, .22 dot pitch, capable of 95 Hz with resolution set at 1280 x 1024 and colour depth of 32 bit. The monitor was approaching the 3 year mark and was still giving excellent service albeit I noticed some patches on the screen which I later realised was the anti-glare coating coming off. In just a week of use, the problem became severe and the legibility of text was badly affected.
I had to make a quick decision and decide on a monitor to replace the Samsung as my personal work started suffering. I had to choose between what was available on the shelf at my trusted vendor. Philips 170S5FB was the best option available to me, even though it was lacking in certain features that I would have felt comfortable with, like the option for DVI input and pivot feature, which it did not have, but I opted for it.
THE FEATURES
This is a no frills attached ’’standard’’ LCD monitor from the Philips. However, it boasts a very good 16 ms response time and a native resolution of 1280 x 1024. The other notable feature on this particular model is the addition of sRGB profile. The manual of the monitor referring to the sRGB states:
QUOTE
sRGB is a standard for ensuring correct exchange of colours between different devices (e.g. digital cameras, monitors, printers, scanners, etc.)
UNQUOTE
I use the sRGB profile for all practical purposes after having checked each profile. I also installed the FPAdjust software that was bundled with the monitor; this software essentially confirms the setting of the monitor and visibility of the entire Pluge Pattern when sRGB profile is used.
This monitor is very much energy efficient with consumption of typical 30 watts when in use and less than 1 watt when in stand-by mode.
IMAGE QUALITY
The screen according to the manual has been coated with an anti-glare polarizer that I found to be extremely effective in eliminating the reflections. My IBM T41 laptop cannot resolve the shade of red properly, its more like reddish brown than what it is suppose to be showing. I did this comparison on two televisions at home one being the Pixel Plus from Philips and another one a Matchline model also from Philips, the third was my existing monitor Samsung 700IFT. All had showed the same shade of red. I am basically referring to the video of Cranberries on their DVD Stars - The best of videos 1992-2002 and the song was ’’Just my imagination’’ where the star is shown wearing the red leather jacket.
Anyway, I popped The DVD into the drive and checked the colour of the jacket, which was really the colour it was supposed to be. The colours however appear to be washed out when it comes to the laptop screen and is not comparable to either of the two others. The Pixel Plus television and the Philips LCD are very close to each other in reproducing colours, albeit the Television has an edge in my opinion as far as overall picture quality is concerned.
The text as usual on LCD’s, was crisp and much better than the CRT, the screen actually looked slightly bigger due to the fact that the viewable area was not 16’’ but full 17’’ on the LCD. With 17’’ desktop at 1280x1024, I thought I was looking through a wide-angle lens.
I use the Philips 150P3 in the office, which is a pro model and has the pivot facility (can be set vertically for better viewing of the word documents). The monitor’s native resolution is 1024 x 768, which really benefits from the feature; however, Philips 170S5FB does not have the pivot feature. I personally feel that with the higher resolution and larger size of the screen, this feature was not missed by me; I can still read the entire A4 size document on the screen without squinting my eyes (although I do need my reading glasses whenever working on any monitor).
PHOTO EDITING
I checked some of my pictures in the collection having sequence of bracketed exposures in a single folder and the monitor was capable of showing the minute differences quite distinctively. I feel I can manage to edit my pictures on this monitor. For critical photography, I am still dependent on transparency film and my trusted Nikon SLR bought 10 years back.
WATCHING VIDEOS/FLIGHT SIMULATION SOFTWARE
I did not specifically buy the monitor to watch videos, nonetheless, I was curious how it performed with fast response time, which is supposed to help eliminate streaking and ghost trails which plagued earlier LCD monitors having 25 ms response time and even higher.
The performance was very good in fact far better than I expected, I can see the trailing effect on my laptop clearly, not really on this monitor. It is not really like the Pixel Plus Television where you can follow the image clearly while the camera is being panned on a dolly, but, perfectly acceptable for all practical purposes.
Comparing the LCD monitor with the likes of the Pixel Plus Television is not really a correct way to judge and LCD monitor but I believe it is an ultimate test for any LCD screen to know how well it performs in the department of video.
I used Fly II to check the quality of the graphics and demo software from Matrox. The monitor did not exhibit any artefacts or jaggies. The colour was rendered very nicely and the shadow detail very good. The right way to compare the Philips 170S5FB would be with a similar type of monitor, in my case I had compared it with the office Philips 150P3 and I found the technology has certainly improved in a short time of just one year. The standard Philips 170S5FB definitely proved to be better than the Philips 150P3 pro model from little over a year ago.
CONCLUSION
As mentioned earlier this is a standard no frills attached LCD monitor and not the top of the line from Philips. I felt the monitor is, more than adequate in all the departments and for someone who is not very finicky about features, this certainly is a sensible buy.
Keeping in mind the price/performance ratio, I would give the Philips 170S5FB LCD Monitor 4-1/2 stars.
Bye Bye Flicker, Hello Flat one!
Thank you for dropping by and reading what I write.
All text copyright Quadophile 2004