Category: Internet

Product: https://www.reviewopedia.com

Product Name: https://www.reviewopedia.com

Description: "Reviewopedia.com provides a platform where internet users can share their opinions about websites, products, or service providers. Real customer reviews are an amazing resource for online shoppers. They can steer people in the right direction and ensure that they're satisfied with their purchases. Leave feedback about the things you love or hate and help people across the world make smarter buying decisions."

Any Online URL: https://reviewopedia.com/==

Product Rating: * *()()()

Pros: None

Cons: See review

Recommend this product to a friend? No

Review:

I org submitted this rejected test review thru the lame, retarded & deceitful fraudulent web site https://www.reviewstream.com; and I'm replacing it in here, verbatim:

"With the increased options for choosing a review site; it has become necessary to even review the reviews' sites. Since anyone can create an entry blog, post a comment on an article, or forum; the real problem becomes: Where can I found a trusty gathering of buyers' opinions?

I've been searching recently for a worthy review site. And although I can not yet recommend this site fully ( https://www.reviewstream.com), being this my first review here (obv test); I have a good feeling about it, and most certainly, I can tell you which ones to avoid. More noticeable https://www.reviewopedia.com. Still, I'd like to believe that this site will not let me down. As a matter of fact; the only downsides I've noticed are the validation thru a Google account (the old generic form seems more that adept to me); that you can't repost it anywhere else, and the continuous undifferent bulk payment. Which I must admit; don't really care much of getting paid; especially such lowly amounts. Anyhow; I do this pro bono; on the hopes of helping people out there. Nevertheless, I hope this doesn't turn out to be another disappointing let down; and at least, gets published. This whole issue is actually; and oddly enough; the whole point of this review. I'll let you know; somewhere else if needs be; if it fulfills the starting query...

But back to reviewopedia; there's not much good to say about it, except that submitting was easy and intuitive. Layout was clean and consistent too. The problems started right away on the information pages. The TOS basically indicated that when you posted data, they became the effective owners of the material. This is a bit shady, but since it has became standard to wager liberties in exchange for liabilities; didn't mind much. In fact; "Scroogle" does pretty much the same thing. I tried placing a test review of https://www.mouthshut.com; another rev site; unsurprisingly. Which btw, already has a couple of dated reviews here. The review was truthful, and hence, negative; which should be even more unsurprising. Everything seemed fine; there was no error reporting. The only suspicious thing was that the URL changed to https://www.consumernewsblog.com; yet maintained the exact same layout of https://www.reviopedia.com, so thought it was normal. However, the review itself didn't appear right away; on either address. I let some time pass; in order to give chance of some sort of human admin edited moderation, or DB sync. But to no avail... So I sent an email inquiring what happened to it; but lo and behold! The don't even dignified themselves with a reply!!! Well, it's needless to say now that I recommend you stay away from them; yet I will explicitly say so anyway, jic.

I did gave it a 3/10 rating; because it seems to work (new reviews appear all the time) for some people. But sadly, these seem to be paid "contributors". Ie, logged and referred thru a different, yet related site."