Category: Internet
Product: https://www.reviewstream.com
Product Name: https://www.reviewstream.com
Description: "REVIEW STREAM write review - get paid
Real consumers Real experience"
Any Online URL: https://reviewstream.com/
Product Rating: *()()()()
Pros: None
Cons: See review
Recommend this product to a friend? No
Review:
I tried submission of the following reviewopedia.com review thru reviewstream.com that's in here (prev post); but it was indeed an utter disappointment. Apparently it didn't live up to their "high publishing standards" :rolleyes: Furthermore; it wasn't even considered a [true] review. Coming from such knowingly regarded individuals, "masters of the english language", and all around spoofers; I'll take that as a compliment. The only good thing about it, is that they did answer relatively quickly; only took them a couple of days. An eternity web wise; even more slowpokish considering their self proclaimed pro halo.
As already mentioned (see prev link); I guess it's good enough if you already have a scroogle account, like to get by measly scrap beggings, or to utter forcefully standardized redundant infantile insipid boring monotone unevenly large & senseless vomit out of idem useless crap; then by all means, knock yourself out. Maybe you're just a masochist and like to be constantly turned down for no good reason whatsoever; or you're too stupid to known better and figure it all out; or maybe you do really like to work for peanuts (lit & fig). I don't know. The can't repost rule is the most moronic thing I've ever heard of; but I suppose it kind of makes sense, once you consider that they're actually paying you for it (and could easily be copy-pasted from somewhere else). An insulting amount; but technically correct. I wouldn't know, since I haven't being paid; luckily. So to me; it is still just an elaborate, semi-legit, disguised scam. Eg, as a company; what biz strategy do they use? Ie, ask yourselves the simple question; do I even know how do they make money?
I also noticed the following interesting quick, summarizing facts; while writing & researching this:
RS only takes seemly positive reviews
RS "lies"; everything can indeed be reviewed, they just conveniently disguise the obv fact that not always in there
RS doesn't have a proper login method, they only recently "borrowed" scroogle's
RS is operationally mediocre for even more mediocre people, at best. If you're serious about getting some experience & advice, or going pro & getting real dough; try Constant Content, HubPages, Ciao.com, Experts Column; or at least Yahoo! Voices, or Wikinut; only...
I hate being wrong; but at the same time; I kind of suspected there was something odd about them. Maybe it was the overly positive buzz on the other searched sites, that seemed to be written by the same employee with slightly dif wording and alias. Well, don't fall for that. Dig a little deeper. And inasmuch as I hate to admit it; in the bitter end; mouthshut turned out to be the best of the worst rev site. If they'd had reply more quickly & just damn publish without so many BS, then I would have never tried the others, and there would never have been any more issues. So my rightful answer to RS is: "Thanks for nothing. If anything, you actually did me a favor by turning me down; right away at the beginning. You're not a [real] review site either; in my book, or any other's self respecting and intelligent individual. You get 1/5; for at least conning some hapless people out of doing your illiterate staff's pathetically kaffir job in the first place. And I would only recommend your hellish place to my worst enemies."- Well, I did say I'll let you know somehow; and I had to keep my word...