Commented on sbalakrishnan's review

as i see it today, it is not important to discuss whether Manohar Lohia is masood's man or not. but it is important to follow the path shown by him. our voice has to be heard in the parliament without which recovery of our investments will be unnecessarily be delayed.

Commented on tr44's review

rajdr please do not get upset, even i have not given up hopes of recovering the money.

Commented on bharat_af's review

cityinvestor has already assumed that city has duped her.should stand last to recover her dues. give the others a chance.

Commented on adi09's review

i think kupidforte has some information which i believe is right. the company has been satisfying all the conditions preset by the registrar of companies, namely the 27 point objection and the HC, AND THIS WORKS IN THEIR FAVOUR TO QUOTE VIKAS_SHRIYAN brothers we cant do nothing about it so read more...

Commented on baljit47's review

thanks buffy100 for having set my doubts to rest. will be waiting for further (good) news.

Commented on baljit47's review

hi rajdr your new is very depressing for those who had expected an early settlement. the company had made an attempt ( honest or otherwise) to reach a settlement with the investors, but was not allowed to continue on 15th Oct. whether it was an eyewash, we will come to know after 28th Oct wh read more...

Commented on sursuvi's review

if the company wishes to communicate, then they can also do it through their website. and solve individual cases and set a precedent for others to follow

Commented on sursuvi's review

if the company wishes to communicate, then they can also do it through their website.

Commented on alam132's review

dear alam131 confirm before you right. dsp027 statement was absolute true when she commented at around midnight. i had check it then

Commented on Sreenik's review

all members are requested to be alert about a public notice to be issued in the newspaper within the next 15 day, giving us the directives to safeguard our interest by the same panel or the HC

Commented on Sreenik's review

all members are requested to be alert about a public notice to be issued in the newspaper within the next 15 day, giving us the directives to safeguard our interest by the same panel or the HC

Commented on sunny123935's review

all members are requested to be alert about a public notice to be issued in the newspaper within the next 15 day, giving us the directives to safeguard our interest by the same panel or the HC

Commented on alam132's review

all members are requested to be alert about a public notice to be issued in the newspaper within the next 15 day, giving us the directives to safeguard our interest by the same panel or the HC

Commented on alam132's review

yes, there is no meeting tomorrow. court procedures should take 3 months to start the payment, that is verification of all files. but our tempers will delay it further. mr beig's statement is irresponsible, i cannot believe it he said it. or you have reported a partial statement and thrown read more...

Commented on sunny123935's review

if mr beig has made such statements, it is very irrespponsible. i bet he could not have said it or you are quoting a part of what he might have said thus throwing the matter out of context

Commented on alam132's review

Dear khalifath I'm only going by my esteemed friend sindbad820's word. thats it

Commented on alam132's review

The positive outcome of the meeting on 14th Oct a) The company wants to return the principal amount +7%. (Explanation by alam & sindbad is not specific & clear, as to how the company will arrive at this principal amount). b) That the company wants to run as before. But now the question that ar read more...

Followed @stshetty553 , @rajdr

Commented on rajdr's review

hi sskanagaraj 99% belong to 'A' CLASS, it is only 1% who belong to 'B' CLASS and those are the ones who have completed 60 month period, but have not been able to encash their preference shares.

Commented on rajdr's review

VALUE TIPS: WHO SHOULD VOTE FOR WHAT (SCHEME OF COMPROMISE)?????? AGAINST: NOT IN FAVOUR (NO) THOSE WHO: 1) ARE NOT DEPENDENT ON CITY LIMOUZINE FOR THEIR SUPPLEMANTARY INCOME 2) DO NOT REQUIRE THEIR CAPITAL INVESTMENT IMMEDIATELY. THEY CAN WAIT FOR A LONGER TIME TO RECOVER THEIR DUES. 3) HAV read more...