Commented on gururaj_007's review

Gururaj, is biased. He has reviewed Chandramukhi (which is a regional language take on the same story) & he TRASH-ed the movie. However, he goes ga-ga over BB (which is re-re-take of the original). The original (Manichitirathazh, Malayalam, Fazil, Mohan Lal, Shobana) is really MILES ahead read more...

Commented on gururaj_007's review

Gururaj, Why are you doing extensive research ONLY for Rajni movies? Is Tamil/Telugu your native langauge ? If you poke fun, make derisive comments & find faults ONLY for Rajni movies.. then you are BIASED. There are scores of Hindi films which are 100% lift from English language read more...

Commented on own review

**This is writer of the review here. I have last used the service in Year 2006. Things might have changed a huge lot between 2006 and 2012 (as I write this comment). No idea about customer service levels, transaction reliability etc. today. Recently, heard that SBI Transfer has the best E read more...

Commented on gururaj_007's review

Gururaj, seems to be biased. He has commented on all recent Rajni movies , saying all of them ’bakwas’ , poking fun & making derisive comments. Just see his history of reviews from his profile here in mouthshut. And mind you, he has commented ONLY for Rajni movies (not for any other regi read more...

Commented on payful's review

I agree that USA based banks are profit oriented (esp. the big banks like BoA) and the same thing is happening here too in India. The service levels of PSBs have improved lately after Pvt sector competition. If you are in USA, try the local Community Banks - they offer good service. These PSB read more...

Commented on arin_12's review

What is wrong with the internet service? Can you elaborate..

Commented on karthikk's review

Another comment on 'Overacting' or 'Melodramatic'. One has to view the dramatics with a 'period' context. Sivaji was expected to be (melo)dramatic - that was the expectation from the audience, THEN. Sivaji in Thevar Magan is vastly different from Sivaji in Thangappadhakkam. These two movies near read more...

Commented on karthikk's review

Karthik, just saw this review. ;A crafty review of a well made movie. Your review should make other people get interested in the movie. Easily one of the Kamal’s best. Emotional. Disturbing. And yes, draining

Commented on Raghav25's review

No counter points. People still think Rajni is a Tamil phenomenon. He's grown bigger than that. He has audience across languages and he's equally big in Telugu as well. His movies (in Tamil) run across Kerala as well as Karnataka. And get a bumper opening. And now, people in Mumbai, Delhi have read more...

Commented on Raghav25's review

Removed due to repeat comment. Do ignore. Ignore. Thanks. RVN

Commented on Raghav25's review

Japanese 2nd large film + tv production country: http://www.mediacom.keio.ac.jp/publication/pdf2006/review28/02_Minoru%20SUGAYA.pdf Rajni movies are seen by native Japanese, not just Indians. He is the ONLY Indian actor who has such an audience. As you said, all other movies are seen only by pa read more...

Commented on Raghav25's review

I have myself seen a Rajni 25-feet cut out in Tokyo of Rajni. He is called as Indian Mahraja there! His movies are indeed BIG there. Rajni v/s Steven Seagal comparison is a joke. One can no way compare Asian industry with Hollywood. They have a worldwide market. Including our own desis who read more...

Commented on gururaj_007's review

I got it. Gururaj has NEVER seen the movie. The review as it is written - there seems to be two distinct parts. One, which Gururaj has written --- and Two, the 'story' part which has been a - neat cut and paste work. Notice the small caps beginning after every full stop in the first para. read more...

Commented on gururaj_007's review

Shahenshah was bad. In fact, most of the movies during that era were equally bad. I can read out many names -- Jaadugar, Ganga Jamuna Saraswathi, Toofan. If you ask me, Hum is also not good. But forming an instant (& wrong) opinion on AB just after seeing those movies, are as bad as forming a read more...

Commented on Raghav25's review

We are not talking technical possibilities or impossibilities. We are talking about humanly impractical stunts performed by James Bond. If he can do it and if we can accept it -- I DONT see any reasons why Rajni or Hrithik can't be accepted like that. If you can't accept that - then it's your pro read more...

Commented on gururaj_007's review

Brig-IN / Raj is right. Chandramukhi is NEVER a Rajni film. The STORY is the main character here. Rajni happened to act in it. This film was a BIG HIT in all languages it was made - Original Malayalam (Manichitharathazh), Then Kannada (Apta Mitra), then Chandramukhi (Tamil, Telugu). Manichith read more...

Commented on gururaj_007's review

Removed as duplicate comment -- Thanks. Ignore pls. RVN RVN RVN

Commented on gururaj_007's review

Cheeni Kum is a well crafted movie. I really liked the ego thing going on between the main characters. Also liked the 'deft' placement of 'bits' of songs at appropriate places. Movie got a little pale towards the end though. Yes, as the author says, this is not for David Dhawan, Yash J read more...

Commented on sumee's review

Double commit and hence this comment being removed - ignore this.

Commented on sumee's review

Good review. The author was right and is the same opinion voiced by other's as well. In his effort to appease Rajni fans, Shankar has compromised a lot vis-a-vis his earlier films with Kamal, Arjun. Balanced review.